Ignore user function installed

[Hanzze]

It was always usual that the hangman wears a mask. Yes, very important! *smile* We don't like to have unwholesome effects for our self.

You guys are really creative, even all this is not new. Seems to be natural in when we are attached to samsara. *smile*

[Gibbon]

Many thanks Wonky, this was desperately needed. It also might be of benefit to allow each user to see a count of how many people have them on ignore.

...but without saying who they are!

What's the easiest way to look at this information?  It must be somewhere in the profile, is that so?  Or does it only appear if you are being "ignored'? 

[retrofuturist]

Thanks Wonky... it's a good function.

 

Metta,
Retro.

[Hanzze]

Looks like it becomes the hangman's "you are doing it for a good reason" motivation tread *smile*

[retrofuturist]

Greetings Hanzze,

This tool helps members tailor their forum experience according to their preferences... that is a good thing.

Metta,
Retro.

[Hanzze]

It remembers me on the believe in the success of worldly justice to change the samsara. *smile* Well some branches believe in practicing and also that Deva have it hard to understand Dhamma *smile*.

Maybe there are some who can share the benefits or ignoring maybe I did not get the message. Maybe pity contains some benefits.

[retrofuturist]

Greetings Hanzze,

I do not understand what you are trying to say - it sounds like monkey chatter.



I understand English is not your primary language - perhaps it would be good to speak as clearly and directly as you can, on the topic in question, without wry musings and wild tangents.

Metta,
Retro.

[Hanzze]

You could if you would like so, sometimes its the mental ignore bottom. *smile* "But even I do so, I have a desire left what he wrote"

If i would say it straight forward: "The possibility of ignoring on a platform which propose is to overcome ignoring is simply not very wise"

But that is natural if we but more effort into keeping our thing alive rather to have faith in Buddhas teachings and the way to get rid of the stress. *smile*

I guess there are already a plenty statements why it is maybe normal and usual in our daily life but, but is the intention to provide such platforms to give an alternative "safe" place or to give people real safety. Is it important to make them like our place or to give them a possibility to get rid of like and dislike?

I guess it is always good to not only watch our feelings, but also to prove our intention. *smile* For sure, if we are still on the way to built up something or to keep things alive in the way we like it, we are not able to see the whole thing of our intention.

While most do naturally agree with the function and other celebrating the hangman solacing, I thought to motivate some which which have already less doubt in the Dhamma. *smile*

So no worry its up to everyone, to ignore or even ignore the ignorance. *smile* One day we will get to see the place outside our castle and its effects in any way.

Wish you will be content with my try to explain it, but let me know the specific points of my poor "try to explain" which are stressful or ignorable. *smile*

[ground]

Just rely on the wisdom of others. Give it a try

Kind regards

[Hanzze]

But if its not wisdom or it does not fit to our idea of wisdom, should we ignore it? *smile*

[ground]

But if its not wisdom or it does not fit to our idea of wisdom, should we ignore it? *smile*

Please do not speak in term of "we" and "our".

If something does not fit your idea of wisdom you can leave it as it is or ignore it if it helps you.

Avoiding is a natural approach of practice. It is wise to avoid what agitates the mind.

Kind regards

[Hanzze]

But if its not wisdom or it does not fit to our idea of wisdom, should we ignore it? *smile*

Please do not speak in term of "we" and "our".

If something does not fit your idea of wisdom you can leave it as it is or ignore it if it helps you.

Avoiding is a natural approach of practice. It is wise to avoid what agitates the mind.

Kind regards

Personally I prover the first person singular, but from experiences it leads often to be taken personally. Even so it is if we speak in the first person plural if a one has the attachment to a group, but I thought it might be not so discriminating if it could carry that one might speak of all, including one self. Somebody else could feel excluded and therefore harmed if some people are doing some personal conversations on a public platform. For sure sometimes that and sometimes that way is better. So I try another way, thanks for your advice. But I guess you would say that it is speculative. *smile*

Supposed there is one who thinks that avoiding is the way to attain inside, could it be that he mistakenly believe that ignoring is an aspect of avoiding? And could it be that this way of avoiding might have its roots in a nihilism believe.
If that could happen what could be answered if somebody asks the meaning of avoiding?  *smile*

Isn't there a qualitative different what should be avoided, and what should be not avoided?

If avoiding all what the mind is agitate would be the way, one would seek for renunciation. Would avoiding at the beginning lead us to this wisdom. Let me say, if one could not get aware of the cause of suffering, would he be able to understand the benefit if renunciation?

If it is so, what would be the propose of a place where our mind would get agitate? Would there any benefit (maybe the understanding of the way of renunciation) of such a place of agitating the mind?

*smile*

[ground]

Supposed there is one who thinks that avoiding is the way to attain inside, could it be that he mistakenly believe that ignoring is an aspect of avoiding? And could it be that this way of avoiding might have its roots in a nihilism believe.
If that could happen what could be answered if somebody asks the meaning of avoiding?  *smile*

Isn't there a qualitative different what should be avoided, and what should be not avoided?

If avoiding all what the mind is agitate would be the way, one would seek for renunciation. Would avoiding at the beginning lead us to this wisdom. Let me say, if one could not get aware of the cause of suffering, would he be able to understand the benefit if renunciation?

If it is so, what would be the propose of a place where our mind would get agitate? Would there any benefit (maybe the understanding of the way of renunciation) of such a place of agitating the mind?

*smile*

Many questions. With reference to others there are many "could-s" and "what if-s". Actually with reference to others these are endless but ... these "could-s" and "what if-s" are also completely irrelevant with reference to "my practice".

Nevertheless my answer to all these is: Wisdom will tell/show ... everybody's wisdom ... sooner or later ...

It is simply that dukkha is the best teacher of all. And dukkha never is wrong in what it teaches. Never.


Kind regards

[Hanzze]

Thanks for the short answer *smile*

I guess that is the reason why it is good to leave the palace but not to build another. So welcome to the jungle, the palace of release.

[ground]

I guess that is the reason why it is good to leave the palace but not to build another.

Hear hear!

So welcome to the jungle, the palace of release.

Know what? "Palaces of imagination" often prove to be more stable than palaces made of stones.

Kind regards