Author Topic: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta  (Read 2101 times)

Offline daimond

  • Member
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« on: July 03, 2013, 11:16:05 pm »
Well, i sugested for reputation in under member name as seen in Dhammacitta.org.

 http://dhammacitta.org/forum/index.php/topic,24275.0.html

there positif and negatif in reputation so people would give a positif if the post help.

but if thete rebel and create dis harmonry among member, people can able choose negatif if the negatif reach the 20 platform so the member would be ban from the forum.

forgot to mention when a people give positif or negatif to a person, you could not given again to same person before 72 hours so you could get calm and not abuse it.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2013, 11:43:32 pm by daimond »

Offline namumahaparinirvanasvaha

  • Member
  • Posts: 769
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2013, 12:00:56 am »
Well, i sugested for reputation in under member name as seen in Dhammacitta.org.

 http://dhammacitta.org/forum/index.php/topic,24275.0.html

there positif and negatif in reputation so people would give a positif if the post help.

but if thete rebel and create dis harmonry among member, people can able choose negatif if the negatif reach the 20 platform so the member would be ban from the forum.

forgot to mention when a people give positif or negatif to a person, you could not given again to same person before 72 hours so you could get calm and not abuse it.


so we ban people we dislike??
my friend I would never ban a person cause I disliked them, nor would I ban a person cause they disagreed with me or held different views from me.

this type of regulation allows the Majority to censor and forum cleanse any other group that they disagree with.
this type of regulation would be a nightmare for the minority group.

Offline daimond

  • Member
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2013, 12:12:38 am »
hm, regular this only control to make people and reflection to they act.

of course this would not be accepted 100% in this forum maybe they would change to adapt (well ban people could be erased).

Offline BlueSky

  • Member
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2013, 12:34:11 am »
We are here to learn to accept everything as they are.

If that person is annoying, and you ban him, when will you learn to see that annoying as they are?

Ban is a very poor choice actually. It doesn't give benefit to you and to your opponent.
Enlightenment is simply the clearing away of misunderstanding. When mistaken thinking is gone, liberation has happened. (Gampopa)


When we verbally indicate a thing as 'this' or 'that', our words, like rabbits's horns, are hollow names, mere fictive imputation upon what does not exist. (Longchenpa)

Offline daimond

  • Member
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2013, 12:37:43 am »
well, maybe after a year the reputetion would be clear  to null so there no huge reputetion collection as we begin new jorney in each new years.



« Last Edit: July 04, 2013, 12:39:28 am by daimond »

Offline namumahaparinirvanasvaha

  • Member
  • Posts: 769
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2013, 12:40:37 am »
We are here to learn to accept everything as they are.

If that person is annoying, and you ban him, when will you learn to see that annoying as they are?

Ban is a very poor choice actually. It doesn't give benefit to you and to your opponent.

also this system would be based on what a group or person thinks is helpful or not helpful posting.
which isn't fair to the poster since whether a person thinks the post is helpful or not is based on their own biased opinion.
what might be considered not helpful or nonsense by the people reading that thread today might be perceived as helpful to a different group the next day.

Offline daimond

  • Member
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2013, 12:45:00 am »
We are here to learn to accept everything as they are.

If that person is annoying, and you ban him, when will you learn to see that annoying as they are?

Ban is a very poor choice actually. It doesn't give benefit to you and to your opponent.

in indonesia we give a chance cause people keep comming and promot they religion even clear we show the rule not to promoto other.

so this part maybe not for this forum.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2013, 12:50:07 am by daimond »

Offline BlueSky

  • Member
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2013, 12:50:12 am »
That is actually good.

That was what happen in Nalanda University in the past.

They are many Hindu came to challenge buddhism.

There was even a debate where the loser must abandon their view, and follow the winner's view.

So, when you are challenged in this way, you learn even more.

Many deep concepts actually can be understood when you are being challenged.
Enlightenment is simply the clearing away of misunderstanding. When mistaken thinking is gone, liberation has happened. (Gampopa)


When we verbally indicate a thing as 'this' or 'that', our words, like rabbits's horns, are hollow names, mere fictive imputation upon what does not exist. (Longchenpa)

Offline namumahaparinirvanasvaha

  • Member
  • Posts: 769
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #8 on: July 04, 2013, 12:50:43 am »
We are here to learn to accept everything as they are.

If that person is annoying, and you ban him, when will you learn to see that annoying as they are?

Ban is a very poor choice actually. It doesn't give benefit to you and to your opponent.

in indonesia we give a chance cause people keep comming and promot they religion even clear we show the rule not to promoto other.

we promote our religion every time we speak about it.
our sects are generally made known by the terms and teachings we use.
I say Dharma so the probability is that I am Mahayana
you say Dhamma so the probability is that you are Thervadan.
from that each teaching or post you talk about shows what particular sub sect you belong to in your respective traditions.
Peace and Love

Offline daimond

  • Member
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2013, 01:13:05 am »
 well, i mean there christian, muslim even it is very clear not to prostling they relegion in there, so they get a chance before reach - 20, it possible some other would respect and stop prostling they religion.


but we not discus indonesia part, how this implement, ajust and change the rule for free sangha, for repution in freesangha.



« Last Edit: July 04, 2013, 01:20:41 am by daimond »

Offline namumahaparinirvanasvaha

  • Member
  • Posts: 769
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #10 on: July 04, 2013, 01:29:47 pm »
well, i mean there christian, muslim even it is very clear not to prostling they relegion in there, so they get a chance before reach - 20, it possible some other would respect and stop prostling they religion.


but we not discus indonesia part, how this implement, ajust and change the rule for free sangha, for repution in freesangha.

so we shouldn't mention any monks name cause it would be proystelying for his paticular sect?
if I mention the Dali Lama I would be helping possible Proyselying for his sect,If I mention Dolpopa I would be proyselying for his sect.
any time I favorably accept a teachers view and mention his teachings I would be in effect spreading his influence.

when I speak of the Buddha Nature sutras I am proyselyizing Mahayana
when you post a Beautiful teaching from Thervadan monk or sutta you are Proyselyizing Thervadan.

  Proystelize all you want I want you to grow.
that goes for any other Buddhist sect I want you to grow.

Offline J. McKenna

  • Member
  • Posts: 1502
  • X X o o X X 137 45' 32" 67 33' 41"
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #11 on: July 04, 2013, 05:46:54 pm »
movement should be away from subjective personal judgments and labels      people are people    judging people brings discontent    us versus them   
...i found there was no "i" anywhere.....

Offline Hanzze

  • Member
  • Posts: 2077
  • (Johann)
    • View Profile
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #12 on: July 04, 2013, 07:42:25 pm »
What should be wrong with judging behavior? That does not mean, that one has learned it in the right way.

Offline Marcus Epicurus

  • Member
  • Posts: 260
  • What would Buddha do?
    • View Profile
    • Oregon Animal Shelter
Re: Sugested Reputation as seen in dhammacitta
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2014, 05:14:49 pm »
We are here to learn to accept everything as they are.

If that person is annoying, and you ban him, when will you learn to see that annoying as they are?

Ban is a very poor choice actually. It doesn't give benefit to you and to your opponent.

I agree with BlueSky and see the annoying person as a person I can learn something from. Like tolerance, or the transitory nature of our thoughts.
The non-doing of any evil,
the performance of what's skillful,
the cleansing of one's own mind:
this is the teaching of the Awakened.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal