Quote from: Gesar on July 28, 2011, 12:02:01 pm I think the Dunhuang text illustrates that with the arrival of Buddhism, the monks took on the role of the old shamans. The new order replaced the old. Humans have always needed counsel and problem-solving for day-to-day samsaric issues. Back in those days, that problem-solving took the form of magic. In a Buddhist society, the monk, as the accepted spiritual authority, would fill that role.Or that with the arrival of Buddhism, the shaman took on the role of the monk, probably a bit of both involved in the process.
I think the Dunhuang text illustrates that with the arrival of Buddhism, the monks took on the role of the old shamans. The new order replaced the old. Humans have always needed counsel and problem-solving for day-to-day samsaric issues. Back in those days, that problem-solving took the form of magic. In a Buddhist society, the monk, as the accepted spiritual authority, would fill that role.
Quote from: incognito on July 28, 2011, 11:28:23 pmQuote from: Gesar on July 28, 2011, 12:02:01 pm I think the Dunhuang text illustrates that with the arrival of Buddhism, the monks took on the role of the old shamans. The new order replaced the old. Humans have always needed counsel and problem-solving for day-to-day samsaric issues. Back in those days, that problem-solving took the form of magic. In a Buddhist society, the monk, as the accepted spiritual authority, would fill that role.Or that with the arrival of Buddhism, the shaman took on the role of the monk, probably a bit of both involved in the process.If we are talking of Tibet than it is more likely that the 'white sangha' Ngagpa (Ngakpa) of non-monastic Lamas either emerged from within the shamans as the Nyingma grew, or has become of a higher status, leaving the shamans to perform at village level.
Good post, sensible stuff. Funny that you referred me to Alexandra David-Neel. It's back to the basics! That and "Way of the White Clouds" were the books that turned me on to TB in the first place. But I've been meaning to re-read David-Neel, thanks for the reminder.Yes, sometimes it's not possible to disentangle the different elements of and influences into a culture. I didn't know Tibetan doctors appeal to the spirits sometimes. The Tib. doctors I've known don't do that. They disapprove of anything remotely resembling shamanism.
It's true that the shamans (if we consider Bon as former shamanism) took on the role of the monk, assimilated to Buddhism. And I've always wondered if shamanism was still practiced in Tibet, alongside Buddhism, but as you say, Yeshe, at the village level, like it is in Mongolia. But no one ever writes about that, I haven't seen it researched. The only sign I've seen of that is the film, "Oracles of Ladakh". The traditional oracles are all women, and their trance ritual is identical to Siberian/Inner Asian shamanism. From what little I've heard of the Ngagpas, it sounds like they've carried on aspects of the shamanic tradition, but I don't know much about it.
I must admit i havent read every post in this thread so may have missed something... What exactly is black magic? what is white magic? are we bringing in terms familiar to us in a western christian tradition without understanding other cultural contexts. I remember describing chod practice to a friend who immedietely said " oh your practicicng the dark side"...!!!! Any comments??
What exactly is black magic?